It’s funny, when I started writing each new paper I kept hitting a wall when I wanted to credit my sources. When I was attempting to follow the formal rules for citing a source, I was also breaking apart the framework that made my argument solid with a clumsy transition from my interpretation of the idea into the actual source of the idea itself.
It just occurred to me that the easiest papers to read were written as though the writer had just had a chat with the original idea guy or gal. They were discussing a concept and using evidence from other peoples work seamlessly because of the level of familiarity that they had with the raw concept and the source writer.
In many cases the research papers and journal articles that I am reading are written by some of the greatest minds in the business community. These writers are prolific and have produced books, articles, case studies and even have YouTube channels all about their concepts. What I discovered is that I too, am getting to know these brilliant minds. I now understand and can use examples from the different works because I am getting familiar with their theories.
I will be referring to these gifted academics in papers (respectfully and with the correct CMOS footnotes) as though I know them. The risk of not giving sources credit is too high to not work as hard as I can at finding a way to do this well. I am going to try this approach for my next two papers. Kaplan, Miles, Kotter et al are now my friends and trusted inner circle. Starting today I will be crediting them the same way I would credit an idea from a call with my mom or lunch with a friend.
My goal from this test is to see if it helps my writing become fluid again and see if it helps me to take some of the crispy tone out of the sentences supported by a citation. From what I understand this is a skill that needs practice and will someday become something I no longer have to work at. Until such time as I can integrate credit with the best of them, these celebrities of academia are my peeps.